Jurisdictional AI for legal practice

Practised in
South African law.

SenseFrame is a matter-based legal workspace built on South African law, for attorneys, advocates, legal teams and firms.

  • Free 14-day trial
  • Up to 5 users
  • No payment card required

One matter.
In full.

Artefacts, authorities, queries and drafts remain together in the context of the matter.

Why Jurisdictional AI

The world's best legal AI was never built for South African law.
SenseFrame was.

South African law is not a market segment. It is a legal system.

Roman-Dutch common law shaped by English procedure, governed by constitutional supremacy, interpreted through its own courts, its own precedent and its own legal tradition.

Global legal AI is built broadly and localised afterwards. SenseFrame took the opposite path.

One jurisdiction, taken seriously in full. From the Constitution down.

Jurisdictional AI

A system built from one legal system, for the practitioners who practise within it. It begins with the jurisdiction rather than localising to it afterwards.

South African law is our first language.

The Platform

Every matter, mastered.

The complete matter, from first document to final draft.

Workspace · Matters
Matters
A Matter is your central legal workspace. Keep every artefact, draft and query together in one place.
+ New Matter

AllPersonalTeams
New
Cedar & Coast Advisory (Pty) LtdUrgent interdict: restraint, confidential information and client non-solicitation.MAT378
2 teams
Acme ContractsACM12
0 teams
Northwind ContractMAT123
1 team
Meridian Lease ReviewMER1
0 teams
Umbrella EmploymentUMB1
+ New matter

The matter is shared.
The context stays intact.

Bring colleagues into the same matter with deliberate access to the same artefacts, authorities, queries and drafts. Everyone works from the same context.

Deliberate access

Control who can enter and work within a matter.

Shared context

Colleagues work from the same record, authorities and queries.

Reusable firm knowledge

Approved templates, precedents and firm knowledge remain available across matters.

What the firm builds, the firm keeps.

Approved templates, precedents and firm knowledge remain available across matters inside the firm's workspace.

Templates
Precedents
Letterheads
Firm knowledge
Authority

Every answer, grounded in authority.

See the authority behind the proposition. The source stays visible so you can verify before you rely.

Answer · Cedar & Coast Advisory

On the papers, the restraint is presumptively enforceable. The party resisting it bears the onus of showing that enforcement would be unreasonable . Cedar & Coast holds protectable interests in its trade secrets and customer connections, and the clause is directed at those interests .

The vulnerable element is territorial scope. A court weighing the employee's freedom to trade may find a nationwide restraint wider than reasonably necessary . Relief confined to the defined competing services is materially more likely to be enforced.

Select a citation to read the source
Case law

Employment Agreement, Naledi Mokoena

Matter artefact A01 · DOCX · Cedar & Coast Advisory (Pty) Ltd

4. Confidentiality. The Employee acknowledges that in the course of employment she will have access to Confidential Information as defined in clause 3 and undertakes not to use or disclose it other than in the proper performance of her duties.

Clause 55. Restraint of trade. For a period of twelve months following termination of employment, howsoever arising, the Employee shall not, anywhere in the Republic of South Africa, be employed by or render services to any competitor of the Company in renewable-energy project advisory, commercial bid advisory or transaction-support services.

6. Non-solicitation. For a period of twelve months following termination, the Employee shall not solicit or deal with any client or active prospect of the Company with whom she had material dealings during the twelve months preceding termination.

Magna Alloys & Research (SA) (Pty) Ltd v Ellis

1984 (4) SA 874 (A) · Appellate Division · saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/1984/116.html

The Court considered whether covenants in restraint of trade should be regarded as prima facie unenforceable, as in English law, or as prima facie valid in accordance with the principle of sanctity of contract.

HoldingAgreements in restraint of trade are, in principle, valid and enforceable. A party who seeks to avoid such an agreement bears the onus of proving that its enforcement would be contrary to public policy, having regard to the circumstances at the time enforcement is sought.

The Court accordingly departed from the earlier approach and placed the burden of establishing unreasonableness on the party resisting the restraint.

Reddy v Siemens Telecommunications (Pty) Ltd

2007 (2) SA 486 (SCA) · Supreme Court of Appeal · saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2006/164.html

[15] The enquiry is whether the restraint is reasonable as between the parties and in the public interest, weighing the interest of the party seeking enforcement in protecting its trade secrets or customer connections against the interest of the restrained party in being economically active.

Paragraph 16[16] Section 22 of the Constitution guarantees the right to choose a trade, occupation or profession freely. That right must be weighed against the principle that agreements freely entered into should be honoured. A restraint that goes further than is reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate interest will, to that extent, be unenforceable.

[17] The Court confirmed the enquiry in Basson v Chilwan and applied it to the facts, enforcing the restraint to the extent necessary to protect the employer's confidential information.

Trace the proposition. Read the source. Apply your judgment.

Judgment

The machine prepares.
The practitioner decides.

SenseFrame helps prepare the record, research and first draft. Judgment, strategy and professional responsibility remain with the practitioner.

The work carries your name. The final judgment remains yours.

Built from inside legal practice.

SenseFrame was shaped alongside practising South African attorneys, informed by more than 25 years of legal practice. Legal experience defines how the work happens. Engineering turns that understanding into the platform.

Co-Founder

Catherine Coetzee

Practising attorney with more than 25 years of legal experience, including leading her own firm. SenseFrame was shaped by her firsthand experience of how legal work actually happens: from managing matters and records to research, drafting, review and professional judgment.

Security

Confidential work demands deliberate controls.

SenseFrame is built to keep firm and matter information private, separated and accessible only to those authorised to work with it.

Firm separation

Each firm's workspace and matter data are kept separate from those of other firms on the platform.

Matter-level access

Access is controlled at Matter level within your firm's workspace. Grant colleagues selective access to the matters they're working on through our secure collaboration system.

No public model training

Your documents and matter data are not used to train public AI models.

Established infrastructure

SenseFrame is built on Microsoft Azure infrastructure.

Security is an ongoing discipline.

Explore our security approach
Free trial

Bring a real matter. See what SenseFrame can do.

Start a free 14-day trial for your firm. Use the full platform on real work, with up to 5 users, and decide whether SenseFrame fits your practice.

The full platform

Matters, artefacts, authorities, queries, drafting, templates, collaboration and firm knowledge, from the first day of your trial.

Real legal work

Use SenseFrame with a real matter and work through the complete matter-based workflow.

Help getting started

Book a walkthrough with our team before or during your trial, and get help setting up your workspace and first matter.

Your decision

No payment card is needed. The trial becomes a paid subscription only when a Firm Administrator chooses a plan.

Start free trial Prefer to see how SenseFrame could work for your practice? Book a walkthrough with our team

SenseFrame supports legal work but does not replace the practitioner's professional judgment.

Pricing

Simple per-user pricing.

Start with a free 14-day trial. When you choose a paid plan, your total number of paid users sets one monthly price per user for your whole firm.

1 user
R3,200
per month
2–9 users
R2,800
per user / month
10+ users
R2,400
per user / month
Your team size sets the rate

Every paid user gets the same SenseFrame platform. Your total number of paid users determines the per-user price, and that rate applies to every user on the account. For example, a five-user firm pays R2,800 per user per month.

Assistants are free

Legal Assistant and Admin Assistant users are not charged. Users added during a month are charged pro rata for the rest of that month.

Month to month

There is no minimum term and no cancellation fee. A Firm Administrator can cancel at any time, and access continues to the end of the paid month.

The trial is free

The 14-day trial is free for up to 5 users. No payment card is required, and the trial does not turn into a paid subscription on its own.

Prices are in South African Rand. No VAT is currently charged. Start free trial

Questions

Before you start.

A few practical answers about the trial and pricing.

South African attorneys, advocates, legal teams and firms. SenseFrame is built on South African law and organised around the matter, the way legal work is done.

Create an account and your firm gets 14 days of SenseFrame, free, for up to 5 users. You get the full platform, so you can try it on real work.

No. You can start the trial without a payment card, and the trial does not turn into a paid subscription on its own.

A Firm Administrator can choose a paid plan and add a payment card at any time. If no plan is chosen, access ends when the trial ends and nothing is charged.

R3,200 per month for a single user, R2,800 per user per month for 2 to 9 users, and R2,400 per user per month for 10 or more users. Legal Assistant and Admin Assistant users are free. Subscriptions are month to month, with no minimum term.

Every paid user gets the same platform: matters, artefacts, authorities, queries, drafting, templates, collaboration and firm knowledge.

Each firm's workspace and matter data are kept separate, access to matters is controlled within the firm, your data is stored in South Africa, and your content is excluded from AI model training. Explore our security approach

Get started

Bring your next
matter with you.

Start your free trial and experience a legal workspace built specifically around South African law and the way its practitioners work.

  • Free 14-day trial for up to 5 users
  • No payment card required
  • Nothing is charged unless you choose a plan

Start your free trial

Create your firm's account in a few minutes. Your 14-day trial starts straight away.

Start free trial

Prefer a walkthrough first? Book a demo.

Already have an account? Log in.